Understanding Tri-Party Case Management (TPCM)
Tri-Party Case Management (TPCM) is an essential process designed to ensure comprehensive support for survivors of human trafficking and gender-based violence. This approach brings together three key stakeholders: survivor leaders, social workers, and government representatives. Through structured discussions, TPCM meetings create a roadmap for case resolutions, access to essential services, and long-term rehabilitation.
From October to December 2024, Barasat Unnayan Prostuti (BUP) actively participated in multiple TPCM meetings across various blocks. These meetings facilitated discussions on individual survivor cases, helped navigate bureaucratic processes, and ensured government officials took necessary steps to support the survivors.
TPCM in Action: Case Discussions and Key Outcomes
Basirhat-I Block (BIRD): A Model of Coordination
On December 17, 2024, a TPCM meeting was conducted in Basirhat-I Block, attended by:
● Government Officials: BDO and local authorities.
● Survivor Leaders: Kajalrekha Mondal, Sarifa Khatun, Rupvan Khatun, and Momtaj Khatun.
● Social Workers: Rabiul Islam, Bikas Das, and Ritu Adhikary.
Key Discussions and Outcomes

1. Case Intake Tool (CIT) Discussions: Reviewed CITs for three survivors and devised action plans.
2. Introduction of Sanyukt MIS System: The BDO was introduced to the digital MIS system to streamline case documentation and tracking.
3. BDO Recommendations:
○ Prepare a list of trainees for vocational training under RSETI.
○ Submit SHG documents for financial support.
○ Reapply for housing grants via Savapati.
○ Coordinate with BLDO for livestock support.
○ No clear guidelines were provided on accessing health facilities.
Hasnabad (KEYA): Survivor-Centric Discussions
On November 27, 2024, a TPCM meeting took place in Hasnabad Block, with the participation of:
● Savapati: Amirul Islam Gazi.
● Survivor Leaders: 9 individuals.
● Social Workers: Soma Das, Taniya Sultana, and Sakila Khatun.
Key cases discussed included Asma Khatun and Nazma Khatun. However, a major challenge was that Savapati was unable to allocate time for individual case discussions.
Bagdah (MATE): Livelihood and Rehabilitation
On November 12, 2024, the Bagdah TPCM meeting involved:
● Government Officials: BDO Prosen Pramanik and PDO Tapas Biswas.
● Survivor Leaders: Taslima Mondal, Radha Halder, Risha Sardar, Aparna Roy, and Nargish Mondal.
● Social Workers: Sanjay Poddar, Sibpada Paul, and Soma Paul.
The primary focus was on the CITs of Radha Halder and Aparna Roy, exploring pathways for their rehabilitation and financial independence.
Bongaon (CLHS): Housing and Identity Documentation
On November 12, 2024, the Bongaon TPCM meeting addressed key survival needs:
● Government Officials: BDO Krishnendu Ghosh, WDO Sukla Biswas.
● Survivor Representatives: DEO Simon Mondal, survivor leaders Tumpa Das and Rakhi Mondal.
● Social Workers: Jagadish Biswas and Srabani Mondal.


Key discussions
● Rakhi Mondal required housing and sanitation support; BDO recommended submitting an application for sanitation grants.
● Plans were developed to support Rakhi with self-employment options, including forming an SHG and soft toy-making training.
● Tumpa Das lacked a voter ID and ration card due to past migration, making legal documentation a significant barrier.
Barasat-I Block (BUP-B): Future Opportunities
Two TPCM meetings were held on November 25 and December 17, 2024, with:
● Government Officials: BDO Rajib Chakraborty, Joint BDO, and Ilona BDMO.
● Survivor Leaders: Ajmira Khatun Turi, Selima Khatun, Mamoni Debnath, and Mafuja Khatun.
● Social Workers: Tithi Das, Soma Sarkar, and Tanvi Naskar.
● PAT Secretariat Members: Rama Saha and Angana Das.
Key Outcomes
● Survivors were advised to participate in the upcoming 2025 housing survey.
● Selima Khatun was assisted in applying for a sanitation grant.
● Government officials assured continued support in future planning.
Challenges and Opportunities in TPCM
The TPCM meetings have highlighted several key challenges:
● Limited Immediate Government Interventions: Many government programs have pre-set beneficiary lists, delaying immediate relief for survivors.
● Need for Proactive Survivor Participation: Survivors must actively follow up on surveys and applications to ensure their needs are addressed in future government schemes.
● Time Constraints of Officials: Government representatives often have limited availability, requiring structured and concise discussions during meetings.
Despite these challenges, the TPCM model presents an excellent opportunity to bridge gaps between survivors and institutional support systems. The active participation of social workers and survivor leaders ensures that cases are not overlooked, and strategic interventions can be planned.
Way Forward: Strengthening the TPCM Approach
To enhance the impact of TPCM, BUP and its partners propose the following strategies:
● Capacity Building for Survivor Leaders: Conducting regular training sessions to equip survivor leaders with advocacy and negotiation skills.
● Leveraging Digital Tools: Expanding the use of the Sanyukt MIS System to improve documentation and tracking of survivor cases.
● Enhanced Government Engagement: Organizing structured follow-ups with government officials to ensure accountability and action on discussed cases
Conclusion
Tri-Party Case Management is proving to be a crucial mechanism for survivor empowerment and policy implementation. By fostering collaboration among survivor leaders, social workers, and government officials, we are creating a system where survivors’ voices are heard, and their needs are addressed effectively. BUP remains committed to strengthening this model and advocating for systemic change to support survivors of trafficking and gender-based violence.
For more updates on our work, follow us on our social media platforms.
